{"id":2963,"date":"2023-11-02T14:55:24","date_gmt":"2023-11-02T14:55:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mywindsock.com\/page\/?p=2963"},"modified":"2023-11-02T14:55:25","modified_gmt":"2023-11-02T14:55:25","slug":"how-the-2023-mens-national-hill-climb-championships-was-won","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mywindsock.com\/page\/discussion\/how-the-2023-mens-national-hill-climb-championships-was-won\/","title":{"rendered":"How the 2023 Men’s National Hill Climb championships was won"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"
The climb is a stepped climb with a steep ramp at the bottom, a flat bit and another at the top. More details on “The Struggle” can be found in our pre race write up here<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

This past weekend saw Britain\u2019s finest hill climbers congregate in the town of Ambleside to launch themselves up a rather famous climb called \u201cThe Struggle\u201d. We wrote a segment analysis here as well as a piece with pacing advice here (which I completely ignored and went out way too hard but that\u2019s a story for another day). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the men\u2019s race, the big showdown was between Ed Laverack and Andrew Feather, where Feather came out on top taking 18s on Laverack. Both riders put out amazing performances being well in excess of 7W\/kg for the climb. 18s is a bigger margin than people expected from talking to riders and fans on Sunday and, based on how important pacing is on rolling climbs like this, we thought it would be interesting to look into where Feather made the time up on Ed Laverack.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Where was the time gained? <\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In order to do this, we will make use of Strava segments. The Struggle has a series of sectors and is a rolling climb (in the sense that there\u2019s a reasonable amount of descending involved along the way) and the segments we will use are \u20183 min\u2019, \u2018National HC sector 1- (no flat)\u2019, \u2018Struggle\u2026 sec2..the kind of flat bit!\u2019, \u2018Struggle Climb Descent\u2019 and \u2018Struggle To The Line\u2019. Broadly speaking these segments represent the steep start, the flattish rolling bit in the middle, the descent and the final wall.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

We will look at the progress of four riders, Feather, Laverack, Gabe Dellar and me. These represent two great hill climbers, a very powerful cyclist who is not a hill climb specialist and an 80kg triathlete who\u2019s just spent a week off the bike due to the off-season.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u20183 min\u2019\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is the first segment, it\u2019s just shy of 700m long with an average gradient of 12.7% and it gives us a good idea of who started the hardest.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
At this point in the race it was neck and neck between our hill climbers. Gabe was still in the mix and I was long gone over 30s back. The interesting thing to note is that Feather started harder than Ed as both riders were capable of going harder than they did.

<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u2018National HC sector 1- (no flat)\u2019<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

This sector includes the one featured above but extends further to 2.38km with an average gradient of 10.8%.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
The interesting thing here is that Feather clearly backed off as they\u2019re essentially no different in time than at the end of the first segment we analysed. To me this says that Feather put more emphasis on riding the steep section harder while Ed Laverack took a smoother approach to that first section. This is in keeping with their characteristics as riders too, as many view Feather as more explosive than Laverack. Gabe and I were truly out of it but he was still doing quite a good showing whereas I had fully parked by this point (despite averaging over 400W for the first 10 minutes – my offseason and breakfast croissants had clearly got to me).\u00a0

<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u2018Struggle\u2026 sec2..the kind of flat bit!\u2019<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is the most interesting segment to see the time gaps as it will show the differences in pacing strategies being employed.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
It\u2019s clear my lack of pacing strategy was causing issues here. I had run out of gas by this point so I think we will ignore Epton from now on. One thing I thought was interesting is how much closer Gabe Dellar was, proportionally speaking, to Feather and Laverack in this sector. I put this down to Feather and Laverack having a pre planned pacing strategy which both seem to have executed relatively precisely. I think Dellar over-paced this section which shows us the difference between a hill climb specialist and a very good racing cyclist.<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u2018Struggle Climb Descent\u2019<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

This segment tells us who\u2019s been doing their research and riding the course first. There was no need to touch the brakes on this descent portion of the course and riders who had done the climb a couple of times would know this.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
The main thing of note here is Ed Laverack losing a second to both Andrew Feather and Gabe Dellar. One second on the descent may not seem like a great deal but one second every 45 is worth 16 by the finish and small mistakes like this add up. This shows us the difference between a great ride and a perfect ride for sure.\u00a0

<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u2018Struggle to the line\u2019<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
This is where the race was primarily won, Feather put 15s into Laverack here (and two minutes into me). His anaerobic capacity is incredible and the race was won on this final ramp. The interesting thing is that if the hill climb was only this last portion of the race, Feather and Laverack would have a similar result. Andrew Feather was a couple of seconds ahead going into this last section but won the race here.\u00a0

<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Could Ed Laverack have won and a brief discussion about the model of Critical Power?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The critical power model would have Laverack and Feather with similar CP values and Feather with a larger W\u2019. \u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What this essentially means is that both Feather and Laverack have similar aerobic capacity but Feather has a greater access to glycolytic power. The question becomes how does Laverack win on a climb which is essentially made for Feather? The only path I see is for him to pace it harder at the start and descend faster with more focus on aerodynamics for the flat bit. The reality is, given Feather\u2019s physiology, Laverack may have been fighting a losing battle though.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The critical power model is a valuable tool for assessing sustainable power output, but it has several limitations. One key limitation is that it assumes a linear relationship between power output and duration, which may not accurately represent the nonlinear nature of fatigue. In reality, fatigue can accumulate at different rates depending on various factors such as intensity, environmental conditions, and individual variability. The model also simplifies the complex interplay between aerobic and anaerobic energy systems, making it less precise for athletes with varying strengths in these systems. It\u2019s probably the case that Andrew Feather is such an outlier and the CP model underestimates his ability to produce high powers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Next time, we will go through Illi Gardner\u2019s performance that won her the women\u2019s British Hill Climb championships. If you want to plan your next race with the precision of the best riders in the world, head here and sign up to myWindsock<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

This past weekend saw Britain\u2019s finest hill climbers congregate in the town of Ambleside to launch themselves up a rather famous climb called \u201cThe Struggle\u201d. We wrote a segment analysis here as well as a piece with pacing advice here (which I completely ignored and went out way too hard but that\u2019s a story for … Continue reading “How the 2023 Men’s National Hill Climb championships was won”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[3],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mywindsock.com\/page\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2963"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mywindsock.com\/page\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mywindsock.com\/page\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mywindsock.com\/page\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mywindsock.com\/page\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2963"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/mywindsock.com\/page\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2963\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2970,"href":"https:\/\/mywindsock.com\/page\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2963\/revisions\/2970"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mywindsock.com\/page\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2963"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mywindsock.com\/page\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2963"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mywindsock.com\/page\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2963"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}